Opinion: Is Skyward Sword Better as a Metroid Game?

Does The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword fit in line better with the Metroid series than The Legend of Zelda series? I think it just might.

Released as the Wii's beloved swan song in November 2011, Skyward Sword got a lot of mixed press and mixed criticism. The game certainly wasn't hated (it has a 93 on Metacritic, for whatever that's worth) but it wasn't quite loved. Critical response included many comments on the game's length, scope, linearity, more RPG-like systems (such as crafting/upgrading equipment), graphical fidelity, and overall different feeling than previous games in the franchise. Personally, I greatly enjoyed the title. That being said, I admit if you look at Skyward Sword next to another 3D Zelda title -- like, say, The Wind Waker HD -- you notice there's something uncanny about it. It feels familiar, but not the same as what we've come to expect.

In my opinion, it feels familiar because you have played something like this before: it was called Metroid Prime.

First, let's look at what makes a Zelda game a Zelda game.

1. Open world exploration
2. Self-contained settings, such as towns and dungeons, connected to the overworld
3. Real-time action combat, generally involving a sword, shield, and selection of equipable items
4. Puzzle-solving
5. Heavy inventory management
6. Character power-ups, such as more health and magic

The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword has all of these elements and follows the series's established tenets quite well, with the exception of the first two points. These two I want to look at closer.

1. Open world exploration

Every Legend of Zelda game has an overworld waiting to be explored: Hyrule, Termina Fields, the Great Sea. Typically, this overworld is an expansive area that connects all of the other pieces of the world -- like towns and dungeons -- together. You travel the overworld to get from one destination to the next. You explore and enjoy the overworld in hopes to come across secret caverns (or grottos) holding treasure or fairies (or cows). Generally, you can expect to pretty evenly split your play time between the overworld and your destinations.

This started all the way back with the original Legend of Zelda on the NES. The overworld is expansive and without borders, meaning you could go anywhere you'd like. Puzzles were limited to using bombs or fire to find secret entrances. Combat was scattered but not mandatory: enemies played the role of obstacles. This paradigm was carried over into 3D with Ocarina of Time and has continued since. Hyrule Field has a few enemies scattered about and hidden rooms to find through the use of bombs or other items.

In Skyward Sword this overworld is the sky around Skyloft, but there's not much there. It's less of an overworld and really more of a hub to visit different locales -- not unlike the observatory in Super Mario Galaxy. You don't explore the sky as much as you pass through it. This may sound nit-picky but it means you no longer evenly split your time between exploring the overworld and being off of the overworld; instead, you spend maybe 5-10% of your time in the sky and the other 90-95% at a specific destination. This brings me to my second point...

2. Dungeons

Dungeons are your primary destinations on the overworld. Inside, the experience is far less about exploration and more about combat interspersed with puzzle-solving in order to advance to a discrete goal: enter a room, avoid obstacles, find a switch, kill some baddies, and progress to the next room -- repeat until you clear the dungeon. Your advancement through rooms typically isn't linear, however. Back-tracking is involved as you find locked doors and in turn search for the keys or switches to bypass them. A notable feature of dungeons is that they are self-contained: what happens and what exists in a dungeon stays in and only affects that dungeon. There is also only one way to enter a dungeon and a dungeon is complete once the boss has been slain. With only a few exceptions -- such as golden skultulas in Ocarina of Time -- there is never a reason to revisit a dungeon once it has been cleared. Again, this was established in the first Legend of Zelda and has carried through since. The Adventure of Link even went as far as to use a different camera -- side-scrolling versus top-down -- when you entered a dungeon or town.

Skyward Sword follows this rule decently -- and has some very good dungeons! -- but it also takes some liberties with what is a dungeon and what isn't. Skyview Temple and Lanayru Mining Facility, for instance, are obviously dungeons but the Faron Woods and Lanaryu Desert around them act a lot like dungeons as well. Think about it: they involve besting baddies, solving puzzles, avoiding obstacles, and even a light form of back-tracking. These areas have an almost equal blend of exploration, combat, and puzzle-solving. The only stark differences from dungeons are that they don't have bosses to battle and you are encouraged -- even required -- to revisit the locations.

What this means is that the line between "overworld" and "dungeon" is blurred in Skyward Sword. What might normally be thought of as a part of the overworld certainly feels like a dungeon. Due to how diving-from-the-sky works, they almost even have doors you must enter through.

Metroid Prime, on the other hand, has little-to-no distinction between "overworld" and "dungeon" -- it simply has a world which you explore. Therefore, in Metroid, all of your time is split between exploration, combat, and puzzle-solving, with shifts in focus being much more organic or subtle. In Metroid you're nearly always looking for the next place to go and you frequently have to battle creatures or solve puzzles in order to get there. The franchise is also well-known for encouraging and requiring back-tracking: that is, returning to areas previously visited with new utensils in order to advance further. Skyward Sword is one of the only Zelda games to do this.

Skyward Sword blurs the lines between being in a dungeon and not being in a dungeon. It requires returning to old locales with new gear in order to advance further. The sky could be just another region (or "dungeon") with portals to each other region -- very much like the Talon Overworld connects the other regions in Metroid Prime through elevators. The game even has a "scan visor" (dowsing) which must be used to find hidden objects or paths forward.

What do you think? Does Skyward Sword follow the Metroid Prime franchise better than it fits in with its Legend of Zelda brethren? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!

The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword was developed and published by Nintendo.

5 Things I Learned From EarthBound

To say Nintendo and HAL Laboratory's EarthBound is an odd game would probably be an understatement. Seldom do you find games that choose to so boldly march to their own rhythm. EarthBound doesn't so much throw RPG trends out the window as much as it lampoons them. I'm twenty years late to the party, but here are lessons I learned from this cult hit. If you've been following me on Twitter, you've likely got an idea of what's below.

[Caution: Spoilers for the game are included below.]


1. Why Give A Tutorial When You Can Give a Player's Guide?
I'm not sure if this is a great idea, but it certainly feels like a novel one, particularly with the digital re-release of EarthBound on the Wii U Virtual Console. Common to games nowadays are two things: (1) overly simplified tutorials ("Mega Man! Mega Man! Watch out for those moving platforms!") and (2) internet walkthroughs. One's annoying and the other's always going to be there for the people who want it.

Historically, when EarthBound was released on the SNES back in 1994 it was bundle with the Nintendo's official Player's Guide. Pretty cool, huh? Better yet, the guide was designed to fit the style of the game (cooky writing included) and laid out like a travel guide, as though you were going on vacation to the various locales.

When released digitally, Nintendo posted this entire guide online. Brilliant!

I would much rather publishers provide their audience with reference material for understanding the mechanics of their games than bloating the first hour with tutorials and UI explanations which destroy the sense of immersion. If the guide is put together internally, it can even add to the immersion, like the EarthBound travel guide does. (I remember the first Pokémon instruction manual was titled a "Trainer's Guide" and look like an adventurer's notebook.) With the advent of "second screens (i.e., Smart Glass for Xbox One), this could work great. It doesn't belong everywhere but is better than boring your players who are going to go look up information online anyway.

2. Embracing the Fact Video Games Are a Collection of Arbitrary Tasks
EarthBound has a strange plot that doesn't try to make a lot of sense. You take control of Ness and set off on a quest to "fulfill your destiny" -- which involves recruiting three party members and defeating the evil Giygas. This is accomplished through odd and roundabout quests, sending you to many different locations and even back in time. Most frequently, what directs you from one location to the next is rather incoherent. At one point, a series of NPCs approach your character, one after another to report the following (paraphrased):

1. Person 1: "I just invented a new machine that'll create any flavor of yogurt. Unfortunately it's broken and only creates trout-flavored yogurt right now. I mailed it to you with a cheap mailing service that will probably lose it."
2. Person 2: "The boss of this town you've been looking for just sent me out to find a machine that creates trout-flavored yogurt for an upcoming party. Can you find one for me?"
3. Person 3: "I was supposed to deliver a yogurt machine to you, but I lost it in the desert. Sorry!"
4. Person 4: "Our master in the desert would like to see you. He has something you may need."

All of this happens without you being able to walk anywhere or ignore the conversations. Why? Because the game designers wanted to send you into a dungeon in the desert.

Loads of games (most games) do this frequently. Every MMO sends you on dozens of quests to "collect the things" just so you can be introduced to a new area, encounter a new plot point, or progress your character further. Everyone's least favorite part of The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker is being sent across the ocean searching for Triforce shards. In the case of Wind Waker, and with many other RPGs, these tasks are decorated with some sort of "plot" details -- the Triforce was broken into shards and scattered across Hyrule with the passing of the Hero of Time and now you must claim them from the bottom of the sea in order to defeat Ganondorf -- but really they're just time syncs and excuses the designers use to send you places. (I'd argue at least 70% of every Assassin's Creed game is this.)

Some games, such as The Last of Us or Heavy Rain, do a much better job of directing the player with story. Other games, like Journey or even the original Resident Evil, don't so much as direct you as let you explore. Both of these types feel less like To Do lists. I'm not saying the To Do lists are bad, but I am tipping my hat to EarthBound for ditching the façade and calling it like it is -- then letting you, the player move on with having fun.

3. Status Conditions Can Make or Break Your Combat
"Mushroomized" is the second-most obnoxious status condition I've encountered in a game, just behind being turned into an eggplant. Status conditions are tough. They can quickly destroy combat balance and devour a player's fun. They can also add a lot of urgency and keep combatants on their toes. What makes Mushroomized so devastating -- much like the eggplants -- is that there's nothing you can do once you have it except leave the dungeon your in and go back to the nearest hospital. Effectively, the condition says you need to stop progressing -- stop having fun for a moment -- and go back to Point A.

A handful of times while playing EarthBound I would find my team completely wiped by an unfortunate collection of status conditions. Ness is diamondized; Paula is confused and keeps healing the enemy; Jeff can't stop crying; Poo is confused and appears bent on killing Paula now. Normally, I could defeat these enemies with a set of standard attacks, but under these conditions I must sit and watch my party crumble to pieces. Again, the pain here comes from having any sense of control taken away -- I can't do anything but watch. Older Final Fantasy titles are egregiously guilty of this with their notorious "back attacks."

Status conditions are great for giving the player a new, sudden challenge to overcome. They are bad when they prevent the player from, well, playing.

4. Justifying the "Chosen One" Trope
EarthBound, like so many other RPGs, centers its story around the primary party member, Ness, the "Chosen One." Generally, this means your primary party member is obviously stronger than the rest of your party, or has some special property that marks him apart from the crowd, and that's about as far as the "Chosen One" label interacts with game mechanics -- the rest is fluffy story stuff. Here again, I found EarthBound acted differently: Ness kind of sucks.

Well, maybe he doesn't suck, but he's not that great. Paula has much better PSI powers and speed; Jeff has handy-dandy gizmos; and Poo learns the more powerful spells. Ness's defining traits are high HP, good healing, and a baseball bat. (In fact, PK Flash is the only move Ness uses in Super Smash Bros. that he actually learns in EarthBound.) For the majority of the game, I found myself pretty underwhelmed by our hero.

Near the climax, the designers redeemed him and made the "Chosen One" title feel more special. Through some plot, Ness faces some inner turmoil and "awakens" as the Chosen One, getting a significant burst in all of his stats, as well as learning a few more powerful PSI powers. This reveal gave weight to the name and made it feel more special. After this event, I found myself brimming with new confidence, ready to take on the final challenges ahead. If Ness had been powerful and felt like the hero through the whole game, I wouldn't have gotten that sudden feeling of arriving at my destiny.

"Becoming" is much more captivating than just "being."

5. The Benefit of Including the Player
The last little cherry on top of playing EarthBound was being personally thanked in the credits and called out in the final battle. It was a small touch, but it felt great to have Paula ask specifically for my faith to get them through the conflict with Giygas for the fate of the world. I would like to see this style of 4th-wall breaking reused.

EarthBound was not a perfect game and will not live on as my new favorite RPG. However, I will remember it fondly for the tropes it lampooned and the rhythm it marched to.

Team Flare & What's the Point of Plot

Pokémon X and Pokémon Y are the arguably the best Pokémon games to date (though I'm sure the upcoming AlphaSapphire and OmegaRuby will happily claim that title soon enough). Why wouldn't they be, right? They're the most recent editions in the long-running franchise, so they obviously include the latest and greatest in all aspects. Well, almost all aspects.

The mechanics are delicately refined and revamped, particularly with the new Fairy-type inclusion. Oh, and Mega Evolutions. The presentation is actually gorgeous -- which I still surprise myself by saying, since I'm referring to a Pokémon game. There are new levels of character customization, new ways for obtaining and training Pokémon -- everything feels better for a good while in the game. That is, until the villains show up and bring their plot with them.

I hate Team Flare. Team Flare is stupid.

A lot of you are probably nodding your heads right now. Some of you are wondering why I'm even bringing this up. "It's a Pokémon game. They all have to have their useless villain team for you to defeat in order to advance the plot and learn the mechanics." I would mostly agree with that statement. However, Team Flare wins the "Most Useless Villain Team" award too easily. Team Flare nearly pushed me to quit playing Pokémon X.

Let's go back to some fundamentals about game design. Why do games have stories? To introduce the player to the world, add to immersion, guide the player, give context for events, create memories, facilitate emotional responses, and, sometimes, tell us something really excellent or profound -- to name a few reasons. Most of those are pretty basic, some of them are unnecessary, and a few aren't the goal of every game. I don't expect Pac-Man, Super Smash Bros., or Pokémon to try and tell me something emotional and profound. I'll leave that to The Last of Us or Journey. However, some of the points in that list, while not necessary, go incredibly far if delivered well.

Remember when you ran from a helicopter while charging down a wave of enemies on a train navigating the Himalayan mountain range in Uncharted 2? That chapter stands as one of my favorite moments in a video game.

Remember the opening scene in The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time? The sky was dark; rain fell all around; a draw bridge lowered slowly. Suddenly, a horse bearing two riders dashed by. The mystery, the drama, the suspense! It was captivating.

Let's try one a little less cinematic: remember the first time you entered King Koopa's castle in Super Mario Bros., jumped over lava, evaded fire balls, and finally cut the bridge out from under the foe? That was thrilling.

One more: remember when Lance showed up while Team Rocket was harassing the Red Gyarados in Pokémon Gold/Silver? He summoned his Dragonite to use Hyper Beam on one of the grunts -- on the trainer, not the Pokémon! Or how about this scene...

I get chills looking at that image. That was 15 years ago. I sort of remember Team Magma from Pokémon Ruby. I think the plot of Diamond/Pearl had something to do with creating a new world. Pokémon Black and White had a guy named N in them. That's all I could tell you.

Then there's Team Flare, and their ingenuous plan to wipe out all of humanity. Why? Because there are too many people in the world and making them all happy is too hard! So we'll just kill 'em. That'll solve it.

Oh, and if you're playing Pokémon X, they decide to do this by revive an eternal life-granting legendary Pokémon. (A legendary Pokémon I caught with one Ultra Ball.)

*deep breath*

Here's my point: if you're going to make me run through plot for hours, give me a reason to care. Sure, it's written for younger kids -- give them a reason to care. Make them feel like heroes. After beating any member of Team Flare, I felt I had only wasted time; after foiling their plans and decimating their leader, I felt like I'd accomplished no worthwhile feat. I got more excitement and emotion out of my first (and eighth) encounter with King Koopa in Super Mario Bros. because I felt like something was on the line -- the battle looked perilous and there was a princess to save.

Team Flare even tried to up the ante by announcing their plot to the entire populace -- and none of them really seemed to care. Where are the gym leaders? Where's the Elite Four? Professor Sycamore takes pride in your accomplishment for "saving us all" but no one really seemed to be worried about it if they just assumed some 14-year old kid would handle it eventually.

Team Rocket was causing a mess and Lance, the Champion of the Indigo League, got involved. Even Stephen showed up from time-to-time to lend a hand and react to the goings-on of Ruby/Sapphire. That made those events feel important; it made me, the player-character, feel important. I was accomplishing something meaningful.

Team Flare bumbled around in dumb outfits with no real cause. If you're going to give plot, make it worthwhile for the audience.

Kyerannosaur Pot Luck: Sonic, Mickey, Nintendo Land, & Scribblenauts

I've bit into a few games recently that had less distinct tastes from others I've found. Not too surprising, really, since not every game is going to get flavor right or even be trying to present a flavor at all. In light of this, I offer up a Pot Luck. Here's a blast of quick impressions from games I've crunched that didn't have enough to really crunch about.

Keep in mind this doesn't mean the games all tasted bad; this doesn't mean the games didn't have a taste -- these games just don't qualify as a full meal (kinda like a composgnathus). On with the multi-crunchinating!

Sonic Generations
Tastes like FANSERVICE!

This game tastes like it falls somewhere between nostalgic fanservice baked up with old (read: not fresh) ingredients. It's full of remixed levels from previous Sonic games, each presented in 2D and 3D varieties for classic Sonic and modern Sonic. The idea is cool and the nostalgia is great -- seeing Chemical Plant Zone remade in 3D is very cool. The remixed tunes are also fantastic! Yet the gameplay and controls didn't hold up for me. Steering modern Sonic along his high-speed routes felt like steering a barge or a Y-Wing, instead of being a nimble, agile, quick bipedal mammal. The requirement to complete challenge modes in levels is also a big momentum killer, which ultimately prevented me from exploring more of the game's content. The first boss felt like an older Sonic boss fight and was decently designed. The game had good level design, hearkening back to the beloved Sonics of yore, but lacked the polish or controls to properly enjoy what was available.

This title was developed by Sonic Team and published by Sega; prior to this post I played for about 2 hours on the PlayStation 3.

Epic Mickey: Power of Illusion
Tastes RAW!

Being drafted from the design ideas and presentation of the classic Castle of Illusion, I was excited for Power of Illusion. Unfortunately, I enjoyed nothing that I bit into. Within my short experience, I encountered a number of design dilemmas that left a bad taste in my mouth:

• Tutorials are presented after the taught action is necessary. The game contains a number of pop-up tutorial panels, seemingly one for each of the game's mechanics. However, these are presented after the actions are necessary. For instance, a pop-up panel explains how to jump on an enemy to defeat it (which, by the way, is not implemented intuitively, as I'll explain) after the first enemy is met and must be jumped over. The same goes for super-bouncing and many other mechanics throughout the first level.
• Why do I need to press 'Jump' twice for a jump attack? Mickey can jump on enemies to defeat them, à la Super Mario Bros. However, the jump action itself is not enough. Instead, players must press the 'Jump' button a second time, while in mid-air, to turn the "jump" into a "pounce" else take damage from the collision. This is unintuitive, an unnecessary obfuscation, and causes many problems with enemy encounters and level design.
• Writing is poor. These are established, recognizable, generally well-known and beloved Disney characters. They each have their own mannerisms and language. This game fails to account for that and the text comes off as overly simplified and poorly explanatory.
• Enemies on every ledge. I played at least two levels in a row which had ever ledge marked with an enemy. Anytime that I needed to jump near the peek of my jump (which requires holding the 'Jump' button) to reach a higher platform, an enemy would be waiting on the platform -- and I could only attack by double-pressing the 'Jump' button (as explained above). This is flat-out annoying.

Beyond these issues, everything played and looked like a rudimentary platformer.

This title was developed by DreamRift and published by Disney Interactive Studios; prior to this post I played for about 2 hours on the Nintendo 3DS.

Nintendo Land

Tastes like NEAPOLITAN!

Nintendo Land is explicitly the "let's try Wii U" game. It's a showcase of the Wii U GamePad's potential; it's also a showcase of how much fun asymmetric gameplay can really be. Here's a quick rundown:

• Luigi's Ghost Mansion: One player snickers to himself while tracking down his friends who are all shouting every time their Wii Remote vibrates.
• Mario Chase: One player runs like a madman while the her friends scream code names to track her down and catch her within the 2-minute time limit.
• Animal Crossing Sweet Day: Players scurry about to scoop up as much candy as possible while their friend mercilessly hunts them down with two watch dogs.
• Team Attractions: Players battle together through a series of challenges in games modeled well after The Legend of Zelda, Metroid, and Pikmin.
• Solo Attractions: This is everything else the GamePad can do. Practice now while developers plan on including some form of these mini-games in future releases.

All in all, the variety keeps this surprisingly fun. It's not a full-course meal, but more like a package of ice cream to pull out at the next social gathering.

This title was developed and published by Nintendo; prior to this post I played for about 5 hours on the Wii U.

Scribblenauts Unlimited

Tastes like CREATIVITY!

The Scribblenauts IP is built on creativity and sandbox experiences. The puzzles are there not so much for directing the experience but for encouraging more creative thought. It's very much like a coloring book, in that you take your drawing utensils and create something vibrant, expressive, and fun. These works aren't judged but simply enjoyed. 

This title was developed by 5th Cell and published by WB Games; prior to this post I played for about 1 hour on the Wii U.

Kyerannosaur Crunches Paper Mario: Sticker Star

Tastes like...PAPER!

In a good way! Nintendo is really good about polish, presentation, and character, and the latest Paper Mario installment is no exception. The game is also a strange blending of genres, not quite following any rules, so I'm just going to say it tastes like a well-baked 'sticker adventure.'

Paper Mario: Sticker Star is all about the stickers. I feel like Intelligent Systems has taken the "everything is paper" meme even further this time -- impressively further.

Kyerannosaur Crunches Pokémon White Version 2

Tastes like...POKÉMON!

Okay, so maybe that's a cyclical definition, but really, is there any other way to describe a new Pokémon game? What was the iPhone 4S like? Well, it's like an iPhone 4, but better. I can't think of a better descriptor: Pokémon defined their own flavor in 1996 (1998 here in the US) and they've stuck to it like McDonald's has stuck to their fries.

And since I've been playing Pokémon since I got Blue Version back in the summer of 1999, I can't very well say this qualifies as a "first impression." I can, however, describe my reactions to some of the changed ingredients and say that White Version 2 tastes the best out of the series.