Playing The Last Story feels like catching the JRPG genre in puberty. From my taste-test, the game doesn't seem to quite know where it fits. Is it traditional or new age? Is it last gen or current gen? It's as though Mistwalker knew the classic JRPG equation needed to change but wasn't quite sure of all the ways to change it. Evolution is happening, but this game came out somewhere in the middle of that.
For this reason, I went through a lot of mixed feelings during my crunching, and actually spent a fair bit of time confused. Let's enumerate.
Introductions are too slow.
From clicking NEW GAME, The Last Story drops you straight in on the action. You have a party of characters; you're in a dungeon; there's no extravagant cinematic or long conversation chain barring your entry to the game play. This was a pleasant surprise. The only awkward thing I have to report is that you actually start off controlling a character whom is not the main character: you use Dagran for about 10 minutes before being swapped to Zael, the apparent protagonist of the title. This actually set the expectation that I would be swapping characters often, which was not the case.
Players want interactive game play, not passive cut-scenes.

Turn-based combat is boring.
The trend in JRPGs for the past five years or so has been to run away from turn-based combat as quickly as possible. Everything must be real-time and action-oriented. Same here, and it's done well! The combat is very tactics-oriented, giving the player direct control over one character and command-control over the rest of the party. Going in and out of battles is seamless. Adding and dropping party members is smooth. There's not even a big fanfare for leveling up. One pit was not escaped, however, and the combat mechanics were introduced at a snail's pace (but not as slow as some others). A good step in the right direction, but not flawlessly done.
Long spaces between save points are irritating.
Correct. So we have automatic checkpoints. Moving on now.
Inventory management is cumbersome.
This actually baffles me more than probably any other RPG trope. Why does every role-playing game (especially JRPGs) use a different inventory management system and store implementation? Every single game. Golden Sun did shops right back in 2001. Why didn't everyone else just steal from Camelot? Regardless, The Last Story evidently wanted to avoid clunky shop systems and decided on upgrade systems instead. Why try and buy a better sword when you can just make your current sword explicitly better? Simple enough. Sadly the inventory management was still hard to read.
Story first, then you can play the game.
This is the biggest issue I have with The Last Story and with RPGs in general. I want to play your game. Yes, the story is a big factor in this, but I need to know the game is fun. Gradually introduces mechanics to the player is very good. However, this can really start to wear on the player when there's half an hour of exposition between each new introduction. I only just found the cool combat at the end of my taste-testing. I spent the rest of the time confused and pondering potential.
The Last Story was developed by Mistwalker and published in the US by XSeed. For this post, I played for just over 3 hours, reaching Chapter 11, on the Nintendo Wii.
Hm. Sounds like this game is aimed more at people who enjoy the story part of JRPGS. However, it also sounds like it is attempting to engage and draw in people who want cool mechanics.
ReplyDeleteI think maybe the issue is that you can't please both? Some people really enjoy thirty minutes of exposition. Others just want to play! I can see why they thought letting the player do actions (re: turning camera) during exposition might be good compromise between the two. But it might feel like an interruption to the people who want a solid cutscene, and not enough interaction to the people who want to play.
And sorry, it wasn't really clear above - its not that you can't please both of those people with a game. For me specifically, KH gives me story and fun gameplay.
DeleteI'm focusing more on the way games stagger interactivity with cutscenes, and interactions within cutscenes.
You can please both -- as you mentioned, Kingdom Hearts let's you have both; the Uncharted series does a brilliant job of blending cinematics and game play. My issue is with the meaningfulness of the interactivity. Having me move a camera is just boring and clunky. I would rather have a QTE (Resident Evil 4, Heavy Rain) or cinematic camera control (Metal Gear Solid 4).
DeleteYou do bring up a good point about appeasing the JRPG crowd, though. I personally feel that this is actually the downfall of the Final Fantasy franchise: the fans want the same thing they love, but the industry (and technology) dictates you need to evolve. So how do you appease both? How do you change but offer the same thing? Sometimes you can even do everything right and the fans will hate you just as much for it, only because you're different. I actually think Fallout 3, The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass, Final Fantasy XIII-2, or The Last Remnant could make excellent case studies for this problem.